Paper detail

TESS Extended Mission 10-Minute Cadence Retains Nyquist Aliases

During its two-year prime mission, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is obtaining full-frame images with a regular 30-minute cadence in a sequence of 26 sectors that cover a combined 85% of the sky. While its primary science case is to discover new exoplanets transiting nearby stars, TESS data are superb for studying many types of stellar variability, with the number of publications using TESS data for other areas of astrophysics keeping pace with exoplanet papers. Following the conclusion of its prime mission in July 2020, TESS will revisit the sky in an extended mission that records full-frame images at a faster ten-minute cadence. In this note, I demonstrate that choosing a large submultiple of the original exposure times for the new cadence limits the synergy between prime and extended TESS mission data since both sampling rates produce many of the same Nyquist aliases. Adjusting the extended mission exposure time by as little as one second would largely resolve Nyquist ambiguities in the combined TESS data set.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.