Paper detail

Term satisfiability in FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-algebras

FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-algebras form the algebraic semantics of the full Lambek calculus with exchange and weakening. We investigate two relations, called satisfiability and positive satisfiability, between FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-terms and FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-algebras. For each FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-algebra, the sets of its satisfiable and positively satisfiable terms can be viewed as fragments of its existential theory; we identify and investigate the complements as fragments of its universal theory. We offer characterizations of those algebras that (positively) satisfy just those terms that are satisfiable in the two-element Boolean algebra providing its semantics to classical propositional logic. In case of positive satisfiability, these algebras are just the nontrivial weakly contractive FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-algebras. In case of satisfiability, we give a characterization by means of another property of the algebra, the existence of a two-element congruence. Further, we argue that (positive) satisfiability problems in FL$_\mathrm{ew}$-algebras are computationally hard. Some previous results in the area of term satisfiability in MV-algebras or BL-algebras are thus brought to a common footing with known facts on satisfiability in Heyting algebras.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.