Paper detail

Tentative detection of ethylene glycol toward W51/e2 and G34.3+0.2

How complex organic - and potentially prebiotic - molecules are formed in regions of low- and high-mass star-formation remains a central question in astrochemistry. In particular, with just a few sources studied in detail, it is unclear what role environment plays in complex molecule formation. In this light, a comparison of relative abundances of related species between sources might be useful to explain observed differences. We seek to measure the relative abundance between three important complex organic molecules, ethylene glycol ((CH$_2$OH)$_2$), glycolaldehyde (CH$_2$OHCHO) and methyl formate (HCOOCH$_3$), toward high-mass protostars and thereby provide additional constraints on their formation pathways. We use IRAM 30-m single dish observations of the three species toward two high-mass star-forming regions - W51/e2 and G34.3+0.2 - and report a tentative detection of (CH2OH)2 toward both sources. Assuming that (CH$_2$OH)$_2$, CH$_2$OHCHO and HCOOCH$_3$ spatially coexist, relative abundance ratios, HCOOCH$_3$/(CH$_2$OH)$_2$, of 31 and 35 are derived for G34.3+0.2 and W51/e2, respectively. CH$_2$OHCHO is not detected, but the data provide lower limits to the HCOOCH$_3$/CH$_2$OHCHO abundance ratios of $\ge$193 for G34.3+0.2 and $\ge$550 for W51/e2. A comparison of these results to measurements from various sources in the literature indicates that the source luminosities may be correlated with the HCOOCH$_3$/(CH$_2$OH)$_2$ and HCOOCH$_3$/CH$_2$OHCHO ratios. This apparent correlation may be a consequence of the relative timescales each source spend at different temperatures-ranges in their evolution. Furthermore, we obtain lower limits to the ratio of (CH$_2$OH)$_2$/CH2OHCHO for G34.3+0.2 ($\ge$6) and W51/e2 ($\ge$16). This result confirms that a high (CH$_2$OH)$_2$/CH$_2$OHCHO abundance ratio is not a specific property of comets, as previously speculated.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.