Paper detail

Tension Bounds for Information Complexity

The main contribution of this work is to relate information complexity to "tension" [Prabhakaran and Prabhakaran, 2014] - an information-theoretic quantity defined with no reference to protocols - and to illustrate that it allows deriving strong lower-bounds on information complexity. In particular, we use a very special case of this connection to give a quantitatively tighter connection between information complexity and discrepancy than the one in the work of Braverman and Weinstein (2012) (albeit, restricted to independent inputs). Further, as tension is in fact a multi-dimensional notion, it enables us to bound the 2-dimensional region that represents the trade-off between the amounts of communication in the two directions in a 2-party protocol. This work is also intended to highlight tension as a fundamental measure of correlation between a pair of random variables, with rich connections to a variety of questions in computer science and information theory.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.