Paper detail

Temporal Variation of the Fundamental Physical Quantities in a Static Universe

The standard interpretation of the observed redshifted spectra and luminosities towards distant astrophysical objects is that the universe is expanding, an inference which is found to be consistent with other cosmological probes as well. Clearly, only the interpretation of {\it dimensionless} quantities does not depend on the physical unit system as opposed to {\it dimensional} quantities whose dynamics does depend on the arbitrarily chosen system of units. All that redshift or luminosity measurements really indicate is that cosmological scales expand {\it relative} to local scales. An alternative choice of a ruler could be the distance between two remote galaxies, in which case local distances have to decrease with time (with respect to the ruler) for consistency with redshift measurements. In the latter choice, microscopic scales such as the Compton wavelength, or the Planck length, decrease with time, and consequently fundamental `constants' such as the Planck constant, speed of light, Newton gravitational constant, and particle masses, are spacetime-dependent. To illustrate this fundamental indeterminacy we construct an alternative interpretation to the expanding model that is characterized by a static metric with time-dependent fundamental physical quantities. The two alternative descriptions, are referred to as the `expanding' and `static' space perspectives, respectively. Cosmological inflation, recombination, and all other early universe processes are unaltered; the `expanding' and `static' perspectives are associated with exactly the same cosmological model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.