Paper detail

Temporal Analysis of Literary and Programming Prose

Literary works reference a variety of globally shared themes including well-known people, events, and time periods. It is particularly interesting to locate patterns that are either invariant across time or exhibit a characteristic change across time, as they could imply something important about society that those works record. This paper suggests the use of Google n-gram viewer as a fast prototyping method for examining time-based properties over a rich sample of literary prose. Using this method, we find that some repeating periods of time, like Sunday, are referenced disproportionally, allowing us to pose questions such as why a day like Thursday is so unpopular. Furthermore, by treating software as a work of prose, we can apply a similar analysis to open-source software repositories and explore time-based relations in commit logs. Doing a simple statistical analysis on a few temporal keywords in the log records, we reinforce and weaken a few beliefs on how college students approach open source software. Finally, we help readers working on their own temporal analysis by comparing the fundamental differences between literary works and code repositories, and suggest blog or wiki as recently-emerging works.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.