Paper detail

Taylor Domination, Difference Equations, and Bautin Ideals

We compare three approaches to studying the behavior of an analytic function $f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kz^k$ from its Taylor coefficients. The first is "Taylor domination" property for $f(z)$ in the complex disk $D_R$, which is an inequality of the form \[ |a_{k}|R^{k}\leq C\ \max_{i=0,\dots,N}\ |a_{i}|R^{i}, \ k \geq N+1. \] The second approach is based on a possibility to generate $a_k$ via recurrence relations. Specifically, we consider linear non-stationary recurrences of the form \[ a_{k}=\sum_{j=1}^{d}c_{j}(k)\cdot a_{k-j},\ \ k=d,d+1,\dots, \] with uniformly bounded coefficients. In the third approach we assume that $a_k=a_k(λ)$ are polynomials in a finite-dimensional parameter $λ\in {\mathbb C}^n.$ We study "Bautin ideals" $I_k$ generated by $a_{1}(λ),\ldots,a_{k}(λ)$ in the ring ${\mathbb C}[λ]$ of polynomials in $λ$. \smallskip These three approaches turn out to be closely related. We present some results and questions in this direction.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.