Paper detail

Task-parallel in-situ temporal compression of large-scale computational fluid dynamics data

Present day computational fluid dynamics simulations generate extremely large amounts of data, sometimes on the order of TB/s. Often, a significant fraction of this data is discarded because current storage systems are unable to keep pace. To address this, data compression algorithms can be applied to data arrays containing flow quantities of interest to reduce the overall amount of storage. Compression methods either exactly reconstruct the original dataset (lossless compression) or provide an approximate representation of the original dataset (lossy compression). The matrix column interpolative decomposition (ID) can be implemented as a type of lossy compression for data matrices that factors the original data matrix into a product of two smaller factor matrices. One of these matrices consists of a subset of the columns of the original data matrix, while the other is a coefficient matrix which approximates the columns of the original data matrix as linear combinations of the selected columns. Motivating this work is the observation that the structure of ID algorithms makes them a natural fit for the asynchronous nature of task-based parallelism; they are able to operate independently on sub-domains of the system of interest and, as a result, provide varied levels of compression. Using the task-based Legion programming model, a single-pass ID algorithm (SPID) for CFD applications is implemented. Performance studies, scalability, and the accuracy of the compression algorithms are presented for an analytical Taylor-Green vortex problem, followed by a large-scale implementation of a compressible Taylor-Green vortex using a high-order Navier-Stokes solver. In both cases, compression factors exceeding 100 are achieved with relative errors at or below 10e-3. Moreover, strong and weak scaling results demonstrate that introducing SPID to solvers leads to negligible increases in runtime.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.