Paper detail

Task-based assessment of binned and list-mode SPECT systems

In SPECT, list-mode (LM) format allows storing data at higher precision compared to binned data. There is significant interest in investigating whether this higher precision translates to improved performance on clinical tasks. Towards this goal, in this study, we quantitatively investigated whether processing data in LM format, and in particular, the energy attribute of the detected photon, provides improved performance on the task of absolute quantification of region-of-interest (ROI) uptake in comparison to processing the data in binned format. We conducted this evaluation study using a DaTscan brain SPECT acquisition protocol, conducted in the context of imaging patients with Parkinson's disease. This study was conducted with a synthetic phantom. A signal-known exactly/background-known-statistically (SKE/BKS) setup was considered. An ordered-subset expectation-maximization algorithm was used to reconstruct images from data acquired in LM format, including the scatter-window data, and including the energy attribute of each LM event. Using a realistic 2-D SPECT system simulation, quantification tasks were performed on the reconstructed images. The results demonstrated improved quantification performance when LM data was used compared to binning the attributes in all the conducted evaluation studies. Overall, we observed that LM data, including the energy attribute, yielded improved performance on absolute quantification tasks compared to binned data.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.