Paper detail

Tailoring galaxies: size-luminosity-surface brightness relations of bulges and disks along the morphological sequence

We measure the scaling relations of the bulges and disks of the EFIGI galaxies in the nearby Universe versus morphology, using bulge and disk decomposition of SDSS gri images with SourceXtractor++. The Kormendy (1977) relation between effective surface brightness and effective radius of E galaxies extends to the bulges of types S0 to Sb, whereas fainter and smaller bulges of later Hubble types depart from it, with decreasing bulge-to-total ratio (B/T) and Sérsic indices. There is a continuous transition from pseudo-bulges to classical ones, proposed to occur for g magnitudes between -17.8 to -19.1. The size-luminosity relations for E and dE types are steeper and similar to those from Binggeli et al. (1984), resp., below which EFIGI lenticular and spiral bulges display a curved relation. The disks and irregulars also follow a continuous curved size-luminosity relation such that while they grow, they first brighten and then stabilize in surface brightness. Moreover, we obtain the unprecedented result that the effective radii of both the bulges and disks of spirals increase as power-laws of B/T, with a steeper increase for the bulges. The increase with B/T is much steeper and similar for the bulges and disks of lenticulars. The ratio of disk-to-bulge effective radii varies accordingly across 2 orders of magnitude in B/T for all lenticular and spiral types, with a mean disk-to-bulge ratio decreasing from ~15 for Sbc to Scd types to ~6 for S0. We tabulate all derived scaling relations, so that they can be used to build realistic mock images of nearby galaxies. The new curved size-luminosity relations will prevent over or under estimates of bulge, disk and galaxy sizes at all magnitudes. These results complement the analysis of Quilley & de Lapparent (2022) by providing the joint size and luminosity variations of bulges and disks, as they evolve reversely along the Hubble sequence.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.