Paper detail

Tail behavior of Markov-modulated generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes

We study the tail behavior of Markov-modulated generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes -- that is, solutions to Langevin-type stochastic differential equations driven by a background continuous-time Markov chain. To this end, we consider a sequence of Markov modulated random affine functions $ Ψ_{n} : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} $, $ n \in \mathbb{N} $, and the associated iterated function system defined recursively by $ X_0^x := x $ and $ X_{n}^x := Ψ_{n-1}(X_{n-1}^x) $ for $ x \in \mathbb{R} $, $n \in \mathbb{N}$. We analyze the tail behavior of the stationary distribution of such a Markov chain using tools from Markov renewal theory. Our approach extends Goldie's implicit renewal theory~\cite{Goldie:91} and can be seen as an adaptation of Kesten's work on products of random matrices~\cite{Kesten:73} to the one-dimensional setting of random affine function systems. These results have applications in diverse areas of applied probability, including queueing theory, econometrics, mathematical finance, and population dynamics.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.