Paper detail

Tackling the Score Shift in Cross-Lingual Speaker Verification by Exploiting Language Information

This paper contains a post-challenge performance analysis on cross-lingual speaker verification of the IDLab submission to the VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challenge 2021 (VoxSRC-21). We show that current speaker embedding extractors consistently underestimate speaker similarity in within-speaker cross-lingual trials. Consequently, the typical training and scoring protocols do not put enough emphasis on the compensation of intra-speaker language variability. We propose two techniques to increase cross-lingual speaker verification robustness. First, we enhance our previously proposed Large-Margin Fine-Tuning (LM-FT) training stage with a mini-batch sampling strategy which increases the amount of intra-speaker cross-lingual samples within the mini-batch. Second, we incorporate language information in the logistic regression calibration stage. We integrate quality metrics based on soft and hard decisions of a VoxLingua107 language identification model. The proposed techniques result in a 11.7% relative improvement over the baseline model on the VoxSRC-21 test set and contributed to our third place finish in the corresponding challenge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.