Paper detail

T Dwarfs and the Substellar Mass Function. I. Monte Carlo Simulations

Monte Carlo simulations of the field substellar mass function (MF) are presented. Starting from various representations of the MF below 0.1 M$_{\sun}$ and the stellar birth rate, luminosity functions (LFs) and T$_{eff}$ distributions are produced for comparison with observed samples. These distributions exhibit distinct minima in the mid-type L dwarf regime followed by a rise in number density for fainter/cooler brown dwarfs, predicting many more T-type and cooler brown dwarfs in the field even for relatively shallow mass functions. Deuterium-burning brown dwarfs dominate field objects with 400 $\leq$ T$_{eff}$ $\leq$ 2000 K, while non-fusing brown dwarfs make up a substantial proportion of field dwarfs with T$_{eff}$ $\leq$ 500 K. The shape of the substellar LF is fairly consistent for various assumptions of the Galactic birth rate, choice of evolutionary model, and adopted age and mass ranges, particularly for field T dwarfs, which as a population provide the best constraints for the field substellar MF. Exceptions include a depletion of objects with 1200 $\leq$ T$_{eff}$ $\leq$ 2000 K in ``halo'' systems. Unresolved multiple systems tend to enhance features in the observed LF and may contribute significantly to the space density of very cool brown dwarfs. However, these effects are small ($<$ 10% for T$_{eff} \lesssim 300$ K) for binary fractions typical for brown dwarf systems (10--20%). An analytic approximation to correct the observed space density for unresolved multiple systems in a magnitude-limited survey is derived. [ABRIDGED]

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.