Paper detail

SZ Scaling Relations of Galaxy Groups and Clusters Near the North Ecliptic Pole

SZ scaling relations have been used to test the self-similar prediction for massive galaxy clusters, but little attention has been given to individual galaxy groups. We investigate the scaling relations of galaxy groups and clusters near the North Ecliptic Pole using X-ray and SZ observations. This region of the sky is where both the ROSAT and Planck satellites achieved their deepest observations, permitting the investigation of lower mass systems. Our sample consists of 62 X-ray detected groups and clusters, spanning a mass range of $10^{13.4}M_{\odot}<~M_{500}<10^{15}M_{\odot}$ and redshifts of $0.03\lesssim z \lesssim 0.82$. We extract the total SZ flux from unresolved Planck data and estimate the fraction of the SZ flux within $R_{500}$ assuming two different pressure profiles. The SZ scaling relations were derived using a Bayesian technique that accounts for censored data. We find a power law slope of $1.73^{+0.19}_{-0.18}$ for the $Y_{SZ}-M_{500}$ relation which is consistent with the self-similar prediction of 5/3. The slope of $0.89^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ for the $Y_{SZ}-L_{X,500}$ relation is in agreement with other observational studies but not the self-similar prediction of 5/4, and the $Y_{SZ}-Y_{X}$ relation lies below the 1:1 relation when the slope is fixed to unity. The determined scaling relations are dependent on the selected pressure profile, so resolved data are needed to determine the effects of AGN feedback. In addition, we find a number of potential cluster candidates in the Planck Compton maps that were not identified in our X-ray sample.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.