Paper detail

Systematics and symmetry in molecular phylogenetic modelling: perspectives from physics

The aim of this review is to present and analyze the probabilistic models of mathematical phylogenetics which have been intensively used in recent years in biology as the cornerstone of attempts to infer and reconstruct the ancestral relationships between species. We outline the development of theoretical phylogenetics, from the earliest studies based on morphological characters, through to the use of molecular data in a wide variety of forms. We bring the lens of mathematical physics to bear on the formulation of theoretical models, focussing on the applicability of many methods from the toolkit of that tradition -- techniques of groups and representations to guide model specification and to exploit the multilinear setting of the models in the presence of underlying symmetries; extensions to coalgebraic properties of the generators associated to rate matrices underlying the models, in relation to the graphical structures (trees and networks) which form the search space for inferring evolutionary trees. Aspects presented, include relating model classes to relevant matrix Lie algebras, as well as manipulations with group characters to enumerate various natural polynomial invariants, for identifying robust, low-parameter quantities for use in inference. Above all, we wish to emphasize the many features of multipartite entanglement which are shared between descriptions of quantum states on the physics side, and the multi-way tensor probability arrays arising in phylogenetics. In some instances, well-known objects such as the Cayley hyperdeterminant (the `tangle') can be directly imported into the formalism -- for models with binary character traits, and triplets of taxa. In other cases new objects appear, such as the remarkable quintic `squangle' invariants for quartet tree discrimination and DNA data, with their own unique interpretation in the phylogenetic modeling context.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.