Paper detail

Systematic study of the peak energy of the broad-band Gamma-Ray Burst

We have performed a systematic study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), which have various values in the peak energy of the $νF_ν$ spectrum of the prompt emission, $E_{\rm peak}$, observed by \textsl{Swift}/BAT and \textsl{Fermi}/GBM, investigating their prompt and X-ray afterglow emissions. We cataloged the long-lasting GRBs observed by the \textsl{Swift} between 2004 December and 2014 February in 3 categories according to the classification by \citet{2008ApJ...679..570S}: X-Ray Flashes (XRFs), X-Ray Rich GRBs (XRRs), and Classical GRBs (C-GRBs). We then derived $E^{\rm obs}_{\rm peak}$, as well as $E^{\rm src}_{\rm peak}$ if viable, of the \textsl{Swift} spectra of their prompt emission. We also analyzed their X-Ray afterglows and found the trend that the GRB events with a lower $E_{\rm peak}^{\rm src}$, i.e. softer GRBs, are fainter in the 0.3--10 keV X-ray luminosity and decay more slowly than harder GRBs. The intrinsic event rates of the XRFs, XRRs, and C-GRBs were calculated, using the \textsl{Swift}/BAT trigger algorithm. That of either of the XRRs and XRFs is larger than that of the C-GRBs. If we assume that the observational diversity of $E_{\rm peak}$ is explained with the off-axis model \citep{2002ApJ...571L..31Y,2004ApJ...607L..103Y}, these results yield the jet half-opening angle of $Δθ\sim 0.3^\circ$, and the variance of the observing angles $θ_{\rm obs} \lesssim0.6^{\circ}$. This implies that the tiny variance of the observing angles of $\lesssim0.6^{\circ}$ would be responsible for the $E_{\rm peak}$ diversity observed by \textsl{Swift}/BAT, which is unrealistic. Therefore, we conclude that the $E_{\rm peak}$ diversity is not explained with the off-axis model, but is likely to originate from some intrinsic properties of the jets.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.