Paper detail

Systematic errors in weighted 2-point correlation functions: An application to interaction-induced star formation

Weighted correlation functions are an increasingly important tool for understanding how galaxy properties depend on their separation from each other. We use a mock galaxy sample drawn from the Millenium simulation, assigning weights using a simple prescription to illustrate and explore how well a weighted correlation function recovers the true radial dependence of the input weights. We find that the use of a weighted correlation function results in a dilution of the magnitude of any radial dependence of properties and a smearing out of that radial dependence in radius, compared to the input behavior. We present a quantitative discussion of the dilution in the magnitude of radial dependence in properties in the special case of a constant enhancement at r < rc. In this particular case where there was a SFR enhancement at small radius r < rc = 35 kpc, the matching of one member of an enhanced pair with a non-enhanced galaxy in the same group gives an artificial enhancement out to large radius ~ 200 kpc. We compare this with observations of SFR enhancement from the SDSS (Li et al. 2008; MNRAS, 385, 1903) finding very similar behavior - a significant enhancement at radii < 40 kpc and a weak enhancement out to more than 150 kpc. While we explore a particular case in this Letter, it is easy to see that the phenomenon is general, and precision analyses of weighted correlation functions will need to account carefully for this effect using simulated mock catalogs.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.