Paper detail

Systematic Effects on Determination of the Growth Factor from Redshift-space Distortions

The linear growth factor of density perturbations is believed to be a powerful observable of future redshift surveys to probe physical properties of dark energy and to distinguish among gravity theories. We investigate systematic effects on determination of the growth factor f from a measurement of redshift-space distortions. Using N-body simulations we identify dark matter halos over a broad mass range. We compute the power spectra and correlation functions for the halos and then examine how well the redshift distortion parameter beta=f/b can be reconstructed as a function of halo mass. We find that beta measured for a fixed halo mass is generally a function of scale even on large scales, in contrast with the common expectation that beta approaches a constant described by Kaiser's formula on such scales. The scale dependence depends on the halo mass, being stronger for smaller halos. It also cannot be easily explained with the well-known distribution function of the halo peculiar velocities. We demonstrate that the biasing for smaller halos has larger nonlinearity and stochasticity, thus the linear bias assumption becomes worse for smaller halos. Only for massive halos with b>1.5, beta approaches the linear theory prediction on scales of r or pi/k>30Mpc/h. Luminous red galaxies (LRG), targeted by the SDSS-III's BOSS survey, tend to reside in very massive halos. Our results indicate that if the LRG is used for the measurement of redshift distortions, f can be measured unbiasedly. On the other hand, if one considers to use emission line galaxies, which are targeted by the BigBOSS survey and inhabited in halos of a broad mass range, the scale dependence of beta must be taken into account carefully; otherwise one might give incorrect constraints on dark energy or modified gravity theories. We also find that beta reconstructed in Fourier space behaves better than that in configuration space.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.