Paper detail

Systematic Continuum Errors in the Lyman-Alpha Forest and The Measured Temperature-Density Relation

Continuum fitting uncertainties are a major source of error in estimates of the temperature-density relation (usually parametrized as a power-law, $T \propto Δ^{γ- 1} $) of the inter-galactic medium (IGM) through the flux probability distribution function (PDF) of the Lyman-$α$ forest. Using a simple order-of-magnitude calculation, we show that few percent-level systematic errors in the placement of the quasar continuum due to e.g. a uniform low-absorption Gunn-Peterson component, could lead to errors in $γ$ of order unity. This is quantified further using a simple semi-analytic model of the Lya forest flux PDF. We find that under-(over-)estimates in the continuum level can lead to a lower (higher) measured value of $γ$. Within current observational uncertainties, continuum biases double the error in $γ$ from $σ_γ \approx 0.1$ to $σ_γ \approx 0.2$ within our model. We argue that steps need to be taken to directly estimate the level of continuum bias in order to make recent claims of an inverted \tdr\ more robust.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.