Paper detail

Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry

We report the discovery of a serious bias in galaxy photometry reported in the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog (Jarrett et al. 2000). Due to an undetermined flaw in the 2MASS surface photometry routines, isophotal and total magnitudes calculated by their methods underestimate the luminosity of galaxies from 10% to 40%. This is found to be due to incorrectly determined scalelengths and isophotal radii, which are used to define the aperture sizes for Kron and total fluxes. While 2MASS metric aperture luminosities are correct (and, thus, colors based on those apertures), comparison to other filters (e.g. optical) based on total magnitudes will produce erroneous results. We use our own galaxy photometry package (ARCHANGEL) to determine correct total magnitudes and colors using the same 2MASS images, but with a more refined surface brightness reduction scheme. Our resulting colors, and color-magnitude relation, are more in line with model expectations and previous pointed observations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.