Paper detail

Systematic bias due to eccentricity in parameter estimation for merging binary neutron stars

We study the impact of eccentricity on gravitational-wave parameter estimation for binary neutron star systems. For signals with small eccentricity injected into the advanced LIGO sensitivity, we perform Bayesian parameter estimation using the circular waveform model and show how the recovered parameters can be biased from their true values, focusing on the intrinsic parameters the chirp mass ($M_c$), the symmetric mass ratio ($η$), and the tidal deformability ($\tildeλ$). By comparing the results between the Bayesian and the analytic Fisher-Cutler-Vallisneri (FCV) methods, we obtain the valid criteria for the FCV approach. Employing the FCV method and using the realistic population of binary neutron star sources distributed in the $m_1$-$m_2$-$e_0$ space, where $e_0$ indicates the eccentricity at 10Hz, we calculate the measurement errors ($σ_θ$) and the systematic biases ($Δθ/σ_θ$) and obtain their generalized distributions in the range of $0 \leq e_0 \leq 0.025$. We find that for all of the three parameters, the biases increase with increasing $e_0$, and this increase is faster for larger $e_0$. The bias is mainly dependent on the value of $e_0$ and weakly dependent on the component masses, and thus the distribution shows a narrow band in the $e_0$-$Δθ/σ_θ$ plane. We present various posterior examples to illustrate our new findings, such as the bimodality of posteriors. In particular, we give a specific injection-recovery example to demonstrate the importance of including eccentricity in parameter estimation to avoid incorrect predictions of the neutron star equation of state.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.