Paper detail

Systematic assessment of the expected length, variance and distribution of Longest Common Subsequences

The Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) problem is a very important problem in math- ematics, which has a broad application in scheduling problems, physics and bioinformatics. It is known that the given two random sequences of infinite lengths, the expected length of LCS will be a constant. however, the value of this constant is not yet known. Moreover, the variance distribution of LCS length is also not fully understood. The problem becomes more difficult when there are (a) multiple sequences, (b) sequences with non-even distribution of alphabets and (c) large alphabets. This work focus on these more complicated issues. We have systematically analyze the expected length, variance and distribution of LCS based on extensive Monte Carlo simulation. The results on expected length are consistent with currently proved theoretical results, and the analysis on variance and distribution provide further insights into the problem.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.