Paper detail

System Intelligence: Model, Bounds and Algorithms

We present a general framework for understanding system intelligence, i.e., the level of system smartness perceived by users, and propose a novel metric for measuring intelligence levels of dynamical human-in-the-loop systems, defined to be the maximum average reward obtained by proactively serving user demands, subject to a resource constraint. Our metric captures two important elements of smartness, i.e., being able to know what users want and pre-serve them, and achieving good resource management while doing so. We provide an explicit characterization of the system intelligence, and show that it is jointly determined by user demand volume (opportunity to impress), demand correlation (user predictability), and system resource and action costs (flexibility to pre-serve). We then propose an online learning-aided control algorithm called Learning-aided Budget-limited Intelligent System Control (\mtt{LBISC}). We show that \lbisc{} achieves an intelligence level that is within $O(N(T)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+ε)$ of the highest level, where $N(T)$ represents the number of data samples collected within a learning period $T$ and is proportional to the user population size in the system, while guaranteeing an $O(\max( N(T)^{-\frac{1}{2}}/ε, \log(1/ε)^2))$ average resource deficit. Moreover, we show that \lbisc{} possesses an $O(\max( N(T)^{-\frac{1}{2}}/ε$, $ \log(1/ε)^2)+T)$ convergence time, which is much smaller compared to the $Θ(1/ε)$ time required for non-learning based algorithms. The analysis of \lbisc{} rigorously quantifies the impacts of data and user population (captured by $N(T)$), learning (captured by our learning method), and control (captured by \lbisc) on achievable system intelligence, and provides novel insight and guideline into designing future smart systems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.