Paper detail

System dependence of away-side broadening and $α$-clustering light nuclei structure effect in dihadron azimuthal correlations

A collision system scan involving $α$-clustered $^{12}$C and $^{16}$O is studied by using a multiphase transport model for central collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 6.37$ TeV. Background subtracted away-side dihadron azimuthal correlation is performed via the zero yield at minimum (ZYAM) method from raw signals, and the quantitative parameters, such as RMS width and Kurtosis, seem nicely follow the $A^{-1/3}$ law of the system size if the nucleus has the normal Woods-Saxon nucleon distribution. However, for $α$-clustering light nuclei, specifically for $^{12}$C and $^{16}$O, the RMS width and Kurtosis of away-side azimuthal correlation are deviated from the baseline of $A^{-1/3}$ law. In addition, the momentum dependence of away-side broadening parameters is also presented. The results show that there is a distinction in away-side broadening parameters of dihadron correlation function between the Woods-Saxon distribution and the $α$-clustered structures, which sheds light on that the collision system scan for dihadron azimuthal correlation as a potential probe to distinguish $α$-clustered nuclei.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.