Paper detail

Synthetic observations of deuterated molecules in massive prestellar cores

Young massive stars are usually found embedded in dense massive molecular clumps and are known for being highly obscured and distant. During their formation process, deuteration is regarded as a potentially good indicator of the very early formation stages. In this work, we test the observability of the ground-state transition of ortho-H$_2$D$^+$ $J_{\rm {K_a, K_c}} = 1_{10}$-$1_{11} $ by performing interferometric and single-dish synthetic observations using magneto-hydrodynamic simulations of high-mass collapsing molecular cores, including deuteration chemistry. We studied different evolutionary times and source distances (from 1 to 7 kpc) to estimate the information loss when comparing the column densities inferred from the synthetic observations to the column densities in the model. We mimicked single-dish observations considering an APEX-like beam and interferometric observations using CASA and assuming the most compact configuration for the ALMA antennas. We found that, for centrally concentrated density distributions, the column densities are underestimated by about 51% in the case of high-resolution ALMA observations ($\leqslant$1") and up to 90% for APEX observations (17"). Interferometers retrieve values closer to the real ones, however, their finite spatial sampling results in the loss of contribution from large-scale structures due to the lack of short baselines. We conclude that, the emission of o-H$_2$D$^+$ in distant massive dense cores is faint and would require from $\sim$1 to $\sim$7 hours of observation at distances of 1 and 7 kpc, respectively, to achieve a 14$σ$ detection in the best case scenario. Additionally, the column densities derived from such observations will certainly be affected by beam dilution in the case of single-dishes and spatial filtering in the case of interferometers.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.