Paper detail

Synthesizing longitudinal cortical thickness estimates with a flexible and hierarchical multivariate measurement-error model

MRI-based entorhinal cortical thickness (eCT) measurements predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) with low cost and minimal invasiveness. Two prominent imaging paradigms, FreeSurfer (FS) and Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs), feature multiple pipelines for extracting region-specific eCT measurements from raw MRI, but the sheer complexity of these pipelines makes it difficult to choose between pipelines, compare results between pipelines, and characterize uncertainty in pipeline estimates. Worse yet, the EC is particularly difficult to image, leading to variations in thickness estimates between pipelines that overwhelm physiologicl variations predictive of AD. We examine the eCT outputs of seven different pipelines on MRIs from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Because of both theoretical and practical limitations, we have no gold standard by which to evaluate them. Instead, we use a Bayesian hierarchical model to combine the estimates. The resulting posterior distribution yields high-probability idealized eCT values that account for inherent uncertainty through a flexible multivariate error model that supports different constant offsets, standard deviations, tailedness, and correlation structures between pipelines. Our hierarchical model directly relates idealized eCTs to clinical outcomes in a way that propagates eCT estimation uncertainty to clinical estimates while accounting for longitudinal structure in the data. Surprisingly, even though it incorporates greater uncertainty in the predictor and regularization provided by the prior, the combined model reveals a stronger association between eCT and cognitive capacity than do nonhierarchical models based on data from single pipelines alone.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.