Paper detail

Synthesizing Exoplanet Demographics from Radial Velocity and Microlensing Surveys, II: The Frequency of Planets Orbiting M Dwarfs

In contrast to radial velocity surveys, results from microlensing surveys indicate that giant planets with masses greater than the critical mass for core accretion ($\sim 0.1~M_{\rm Jup}$) are relatively common around low-mass stars. Using the methodology developed in the first paper, we predict the sensitivity of M-dwarf radial velocity (RV) surveys to analogs of the population of planets inferred by microlensing. We find that RV surveys should detect a handful of super-Jovian ($>M_{\rm Jup}$) planets at the longest periods being probed. These planets are indeed found by RV surveys, implying that the demographic constraints inferred from these two methods are consistent. We combine the results from both methods to estimate planet frequencies spanning wide regions of parameter space. We find that the frequency of Jupiters and super-Jupiters ($1\lesssim m_p\sin{i}/M_{\rm Jup}\lesssim 13$) with periods $1\leq P/{\rm days}\leq 10^4$ is $f_{\rm J}=0.029^{+0.013}_{-0.015}$, a median factor of 4.3 ($1.5-14$ at 95% confidence) smaller than the inferred frequency of such planets around FGK stars of $0.11\pm 0.02$. However, we find the frequency of all giant planets with $30\lesssim m_p\sin{i}/M_{\oplus}\lesssim 10^4$ and $1\leq P/{\rm days}\leq 10^4$ to be $f_{\rm G}=0.15^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$, only a median factor of 2.2 ($0.73-5.9$ at 95% confidence) smaller than the inferred frequency of such planets orbiting FGK stars of $0.31\pm 0.07$. For a more conservative definition of giant planets ($50\lesssim m_p\sin{i}/M_{\oplus}\lesssim 10^4$), we find $f_{\rm G'}=0.11\pm 0.05$, a median factor of 2.2 ($0.73-6.7$ at 95% confidence) smaller than that inferred for FGK stars of $0.25\pm 0.05$. Finally, we find the frequency of all planets with $1\leq m_p\sin{i}/M_{\oplus}\leq 10^4$ and $1\leq P/{\rm days}\leq10^4$ to be $f_p=1.9\pm 0.5$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.