Paper detail

Synthesis of H-alpha absorption in old stellar systems: Formation of the cluster red sequence by "Downsizing"

We compute population synthesis models for the variation of H-alpha absorption indices (HaA and HaF), as a function of age and metallicity in old stellar systems. The models are based on the STELIB spectral library, and defined at resolution of 3 Angstrom FWHM. The indices are found to be highly sensitive to age variation, with only moderate response to metallicity. For galaxies uncontaminated by nebular emission, our HaA index is more powerful in breaking the age/metallicity degeneracy than H-beta or H-gamma_F. Using a sample of red cluster galaxies carefully selected to exclude objects with emission, we find a steep decline of HaA with velocity dispersion (slope -0.75 +/- 0.07 Angstrom/dex). The slope can be translated to constraints on age and metallicity scaling relations, incorporating measurement and model errors. If the HaA-sigma slope is due only to age, we obtain Age proportional to sigma^{0.95 +/- 0.12}. Because HaA depends quite weakly on [Fe/H], a metallicity interpretation would require Fe/H proportional to sigma^1.2 or steeper. The HaA-sigma slope is consistent with the combined age and metallicity scaling relations reported by Nelan et al. from classical Lick indices. The relations obtained by Thomas et al. significantly under-predict the observed slope. The discrepancy could arise from differences in the sample compositions.We discuss in detail the effects of emission contamination on the results, and conclude that these are unlikely to yield the observed behaviour in the Ha-sigma relations. The steep age--mass relation supports a "downsizing" formation scenario: fainter red-sequence galaxies became quiescent at lower redshifts, z < 0.5. This picture accords with recent observations of truncated red sequences in clusters at z ~ 0.7.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.