Paper detail

Symmetry-plane model of 3D Euler flows and mapping to regular systems to improve blowup assessment using numerical and analytical solutions

Motivated by the work on stagnation-point type exact solutions (with infinite energy) of 3D Euler fluid equations by Gibbon et al. (1999) and the subsequent demonstration of finite-time blowup by Constantin (2006) we introduce a one-parameter family of models of the 3D Euler fluid equations on a 2D symmetry plane. Our models are seen as a deformation of the 3D Euler equations which respects the variational structure of the original equations so that explicit solutions can be found for the supremum norms of the basic fields. The value of the model's parameter determines if there is finite-time blowup, and the singularity time can be computed explicitly in terms of the initial conditions and the model's parameter. We use a representative parameter value, for which the solution blows up in finite-time, as a benchmark for the systematic study of errors in numerical solutions. We compare numerical integrations of our "original" model with a "mapped" version of these equations. The mapped version is a globally regular (in time) system of equations, obtained via a bijective nonlinear mapping of time and fields from the original model equations (Bustamante 2011). We show that the mapped system's numerical solution increases accuracy in estimates of supremum norms and singularity time while entailing only a small additional computational cost. We study the Fourier spectrum of the model's numerical solution and find that the analyticity-strip width (a measure of the solution's analyticity) tends to zero as a power law in a finite time. This is in agreement with the finite-time blowup of the supremum norms, in the light of rigorous bounds stemming from the bridge (Bustamante & Brachet 2012) between the analyticity-strip method and the Beale-Kato-Majda type of theorems. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research on the analysis of numerical solutions of the 3D Euler fluid equations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.