Paper detail

Symmetry-Breaking Bifurcations for Compartmental Reaction Kinetics Coupled by Two Bulk Diffusing Species with Comparable Diffusivities in 2-D

For a 2-D coupled PDE-ODE bulk-cell model, we investigate symmetry-breaking bifurcations that can emerge when two bulk diffusing species are coupled to two-component nonlinear intracellular reactions that are restricted to occur only within a disjoint collection of small circular compartments, or "cells", of a common small radius that are confined in a bounded 2-D domain. Outside of the union of these cells, the two bulk species with comparable diffusivities and bulk degradation rates diffuse and globally couple the spatially segregated intracellular reactions through Robin boundary conditions across the cell boundaries, which depend on certain membrane reaction rates. In the singular limit of a small common cell radius, we construct steady-state solutions for the bulk-cell model and formulate a nonlinear matrix eigenvalue problem that determines the linear stability properties of the steady-states. For a certain spatial arrangement of cells for which the steady-state and linear stability analysis become highly tractable, we construct a symmetric steady-state solution where the steady-states of the intracellular species are the same for each cell. As regulated by the ratio of the membrane reaction rates on the cell boundaries, we show for various specific prototypical intracellular reactions, and for a specific two-cell arrangement, that our 2-D coupled PDE-ODE model admits symmetry-breaking bifurcations from this symmetric steady-state, leading to linearly stable asymmetric patterns, even when the bulk diffusing species have comparable or possibly equal diffusivities. Overall, our analysis shows that symmetry-breaking bifurcations can occur without the large diffusivity ratio requirement for the bulk diffusing species as is well-known from a Turing stability analysis applied to a spatially uniform steady-state for typical two-component activator-inhibitor systems.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.