Paper detail

Symmetries of the Dirac quantum walk and emergence of the de Sitter group

A quantum walk describes the discrete unitary evolution of a quantum particle on a discrete graph. Some quantum walks, referred to as the Weyl and Dirac quantum walks, provide a description of the free evolution of relativistic quantum fields in a regime where the wave-vectors involved in the particle state are small. The clash between the intrinsic discreteness of quantum walks and the symmetries of special relativity can be resolved by rethinking the notion of a change of inertial reference frame. We give here a definition of the latter that avoids a pre-defined space-time geometry, in terms of a change of values of the constants of motion that leaves the walk operator unchanged. Starting from the family of 1+1 dimensional Dirac quantum walks with all possible values of the mass parameter, we introduce a unique walk encompassing the latter as an extra degree of freedom, and we derive its group of changes of inertial frames. This symmetry group contains a non linear realization of $SO^+(2,1) \ltimes \mathbb{R}^3$; since one of the two space-like dimensions does not correspond to an actual spatial degree of freedom but rather the mass, we interpret it as a 2+1 dimensional de-Sitter group. This group group contains also a non-linear realisation of the proper orthochronous Poincaré group $SO^+(1,1) \ltimes \mathbb{R}^2$ in 1+1 dimension, as the ones considered within the framework of doubly special relativity, which recovers the usual relativistic symmetry of the Dirac Equation in the limit of small wave-vectors and masses. Surprisingly, if one considers the Dirac walk with a fixed value of the mass parameter, the group of allowed changes of reference frame does not have a consistent interpretation in the relativistic limit of small wave-vectors.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.