Paper detail

Symmetries and selection rules in the measurement of the phonon spectrum of graphene and related materials

When the phonon spectrum of a material is measured in a scattering experiment, selection rules preclude the observation of phonons that are odd under reflection by the scattering plane. Understanding these rules is crucial to correctly interpret experiments and to detect broken symmetries. Taking graphene as a case study, in this work we derive the complete set of selection rules for the honeycomb lattice, showing that some of them have been missed or misinterpreted in the literature. Focusing on the technique of high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HREELS), we calculate the scattering intensity for a simple force constant model to illustrate these rules. In addition, we present HREELS measurements of the phonon dispersion for graphene on Ru(0001) and find excellent agreement with the theory. We also illustrate the effect of different symmetry breaking scenarios in the selection rules and discuss previous experiments in light of our results.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.