Symbolic powers of ideals and their topology over a module

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let II denote an ideal of a Noetherian ring RR and NN a non-zero finitely generated RR-module. In the present paper, some necessary and sufficient conditions are given to determine when the II-adic topology on NN is equivalent to the II-symbolic topology on NN. Among other things, we shall give a complete solution to the question raised by R. Hartshorne in [{\it Affine duality and cofiniteness}, Invent. Math. {\bf9}(1970), 145-164], for a prime ideal p\frak p of dimension one in a local Noetherian ring RR, by showing that the p\frak{p}-adic topology on NN is equivalent to the p\frak{p}-symbolic topology on NN if and only if for all $z\in \Ass_{R^*}N^*$ there exists $\frak{q}\in \Supp(N^*)$ such that z⊆qz\subseteq \frak{q} and q∩R=p.\frak{q}\cap R=\frak{p}. Also, it is shown that if for every ${\mathfrak{p}}\in \Supp(N)$ with dim⁡R/p=1\dim R/\mathfrak{p}=1, the p\mathfrak{p}-adic and the p\mathfrak{p}-symbolic topologies are equivalent on NN, then NN is unmixed and $\Ass_{R} N$ has only one element. Finally, we show that if $\Ass_{R_{\mathfrak{p}}^*}{N^*_{\mathfrak{p}}}$ consists of a single prime ideal, for all p∈A∗(I,N){\mathfrak{p}}\in {A^*}(I,N), then the II-adic and the II-symbolic topologies on NN are equivalent. \end{abstract}

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.