Paper detail

SybilControl: Practical Sybil Defense with Computational Puzzles

Many distributed systems are subject to the Sybil attack, where an adversary subverts system operation by emulating behavior of multiple distinct nodes. Most recent work to address this problem leverages social networks to establish trust relationships between users. However, the use of social networks is not appropriate in all systems, as they can be subverted by social engineering techniques, require nodes in a P2P network to maintain and be aware of social network information, and may require overly optimistic assumptions about the fast-mixing nature of social links. This paper explores an alternate approach. We present SybilControl, a novel, decentralized scheme for controlling the extent of Sybil attacks. SybilControl is an admission control mechanism for nodes in a distributed system that requires them to periodically solve computational puzzles. SybilControl consists of a distributed protocol to allow nodes to collectively verify the computational work of other nodes, and mechanisms to prevent the malicious influence of misbehaving nodes that do not perform the computational work. We investigate the practical issues involved with deploying SybilControl into existing DHTs, particularly with resilient lookup protocols. We evaluate SybilControl through simulations and find that SybilControl retains low overhead and latency. Additionally, even when the adversary controls 20% of the system's computational resources, SybilControl-enabled DHTs can be configured to maintain lookup performance at over 99% success rate using low communication overhead.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.