Paper detail

Switchable Wetting of Stimulus Responsive Polymer Brushes by Lipid Vesicles: Experiments and Simulations

We grafted polyacrylic acid brushes containing cysteine side chains at a defined surface density on planar lipid membranes. Specular X-ray reflectivity data indicated that the addition of Cd2+ ions induces the compaction of the polymer brush layer and modulates the adhesion of lipid vesicles. The critical threshold level inducing the switch from non-wetting to partial wetting state, [Cd2+] = 0.25 mM, was determined by microinterferometry. The interactions between vesicles and brushes were evaluated by height fluctuations of the membrane in contact with brushes and the shape of vesicles near the surface. To analyze these experiments, we have studied adhesion of axially symmetric vesicles for finite-range membrane-substrate interaction and buoyancy through simulations. We found that the local transversality condition that relates the maximal curvature at the edge of the adhesion zone to the adhesion strength remains rather accurate. Thus, although it is not experimentally possible to prepare vesicles at zero buoyancy, we can use the transversality condition to estimate the adhesion strength. However, the adhesion diagram is significantly modified by a finite range of membrane-substrate interaction and buoyancy. For downward buoyancy, vesicles merely sediment onto the substrate and there is no mean-field adhesion transition. For upward buoyancy, adhered vesicles are metastable at best. Thus, a mean-field adhesion transition can only occur at vanishing buoyancy. Only for zero-range membrane-substrate interaction does a second-order adhesion transition occur at finite interaction strength. For any finite-range interaction, the transition occurs when the membrane-substrate interaction changes from repulsive to attractive. We present a adhesion diagram as a function of adhesion strength and buoyancy and compare the adhesion behavior of vesicles to the wetting behavior of droplets of liquids.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.