Paper detail

Swimming and swirling colorful ghosts

We show that the ideal fluid limit, defined as the existance of a flow frame $u_μ$ with respect to which the fluid is homogeneus and isotropic, and the consequent independence of the equation of state on $u_μ$, is incompatible with non-Abelian gauge theory. Instead, the equation of state becomes dependent on $u_μ$ via modes which are roughly equivalent to ghost modes in the hydrodynamic limit. These modes can be physically imagined as a field of 'purcell swimmers' whose 'arms and legs' are outstretched in Gauge space. Also, vorticity should couple to the Wilson loop via the chromo-electro-magnetic field tensor, which in this limit is not a 'force' but instead represents the polarization tensor of the gluons. We show that because of this coupling vorticity also aquires swirling non-hydrodynamic modes. We then argue that these swirling and swimming non-hydodynamic modes are the manifestation of gauge redunancy within local equilibrium, and speculate on their role in quark-gluon plasma thermalization

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.