Paper detail

Swampland Conditions for Higher Derivative Couplings from CFT

There are effective field theories that cannot be embedded in any UV complete theory. We consider scalar effective field theories, with and without dynamical gravity, in $D$-dimensional anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime with large radius and derive precise bounds (analytically) on the coupling constants of higher derivative interactions $ϕ^2\Box^kϕ^2$ by only requiring that the dual CFT obeys the standard conformal bootstrap axioms. In particular, we show that all such coupling constants, for even $k\ge 2$, must satisfy positivity, monotonicity, and log-convexity conditions in the absence of dynamical gravity. Inclusion of gravity only affects constraints involving the $ϕ^2\Box^2ϕ^2$ interaction which now can have a negative coupling constant. Our CFT setup is a Lorentzian four-point correlator in the Regge limit. We also utilize this setup to derive constraints on effective field theories of multiple scalars. We argue that similar analysis should impose nontrivial constraints on the graviton four-point scattering amplitude in AdS.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.