Paper detail

Suzaku View of the Neutron Star in the Dipping Source 4U 1822$-$37

The dipping X-ray source 4U 1822$-$37 was observed by Suzaku on 2006 Octrober 20 for a net exposure of 37 ks. The source was detected with the XIS at a 1-10 keV flux of 5.5$\times10^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, and with the HXD (HXD-PIN) at a 10-50 keV flux of 8.9$\times10^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. With HXD-PIN, the pulsation was detected at a barycentric period of 0.592437 s, and its change rate was reconfirmed as $-2.43\times$10$^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$. The 1-50 keV spectra of 4U 1822-37 were found to be very similar to those of Her X-1 in the slopes, cutoff and iron lines. Three iron lines (Fe K$α$, Fe XXV, and Fe XXVI) were detected, on top of a 1-50 keV continuum that is described by an NPEX model plus a soft blackbody. In addition, a cyclotron resonance scattering feature was detected significantly ($>99\%$ confidence), at an energy of 33$\pm$2 keV with a depth of 0.4$^{+0.6}_{-0.3}$. Therefore, the neutron star in this source is concluded to have a strong magnetic field of 2.8$\times10^{12}$ G. Further assuming that the source has a relatively high intrinsic luminosity of several times 10$^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$, its spectral and timing properties are consistently explained.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.