Paper detail

Suzaku study of centrally brightened supernova remnant G272.2-3.2

In this work, the results from Suzaku observation of Galactic supernova remnant G272.2-3.2 are presented. Spectra of G272.2-3.2 are well fitted by a single-temperature variable abundances non-equilibrium ionization (VNEI) model with an electron temperature kTe \sim 0.77 keV, ionization timescale τ \sim 6.5 \times 10^10 cm-3 s and absorbing column density NH \sim 1.1 \times 10^22 cm-2. We have detected enhanced abundances of Si, S, Ca, Fe and Ni in the center region indicating that the X-ray emission has ejecta origin. We estimated the electron density ne to be \sim0.48f^-1/2 cm-3, age \sim4300f^1/2 yr and the X-ray total mass Mx = 475f^1/2 M by taking the distance to be d=10 kpc. To understand the origin of the centrally-peaked X-ray emission of the remnant, we studied radial variations of the electron temperature and surface brightness. The relative abundances in the center region suggest that G272.2-3.2 is the result of a Type Ia supernova explosion.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.