Paper detail

Suzaku Observations of the Merging Cluster Abell 85: Temperature Map and Impact Direction

To investigate the present situation of the merging in the southern outer region of Abell 85, we carried out long (~100 ks) observations with Suzaku, and produced an X-ray hardness ratio map. We found a high hardness ratio peak in the east side of a subcluster located in the south of the cluster; an X-ray spectrum of the region including this peak indicates a high temperature of ~8.5 keV. This hot spot has not been reported so far. We consider that this hot spot is a postshock region produced by the infall of the subcluster from the southwest. By using the Rankine--Hugoniot jump conditions for shocks, the Mach number and the infall velocity of the subcluster are obtained as 1.5 +/- 0.2 and 1950^{+290}_{-280} km s^{-1}, respectively, in the case of merging with the subcluster from the southwest direction. By using the redshift difference between the A 85 and the subcluster obtained from optical observations, the angle between the line of sight and the direction of the motion of the subcluster is estimated to be 75^{+7}_{-8} degrees. We estimate the kinetic energy of the subcluster and the energy used for intracluster medium (ICM) heating to be ~10^{63} and \lesssim 8 \times 10^{60} erg, respectively. This shows that the deceleration of the subcluster by ICM heating has been negligibly small.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.