Paper detail

Suzaku Observations of the Great Annihilator and the Surrounding Diffuse Emissions

We report the Suzaku observation of 1E 1740.7-2942, a black hole candidate called the "Great Annihilator" (GA). The high-quality spectrum of Suzaku provides the severest constraints on the parameters of the GA. Two clumpy structures are found around the GA in the line images of FeI Kalpha at 6.4 keV and SXV Kalpha at 2.45 keV. One clump named M359.23-0.04 exhibits the 6.4-keV line with an equivalent width of ~ 1.2 keV, and is associated with a molecular cloud in the radio CS(J=1-0) map. Thus the 6.4-keV line from M359.23-0.04 is likely due to X-ray fluorescence irradiated by an external X-ray source. The irradiating X-rays would be either the past flare of Sagittarius A* or the bright nearby source, the GA. The other clump named G359.12-0.05 is associated with the radio supernova remnant candidate G359.07-0.02. We therefore propose that G359.12-0.05 is an X-ray counterpart of G359.07-0.02. G359.12-0.05 has a thin thermal plasma spectrum with a temperature of kT ~ 0.9 keV. The plasma parameters of G359.12-0.05 are consistent with those of a single supernova remnant in the Galactic center region.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.