Paper detail

Suzaku Observations of Iron K-lines from the Intracluster Medium of the Coma Cluster

The Coma cluster was observed with an X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) onboard Suzaku in six pointings, including the central X-ray peak region, the 14'west offset region, 30'and 34'north-west offset regions, and 44'and 60'south-west offset regions. Owing to its lower background level, Suzaku has better sensitivity to Fe K-alpha lines than other satellites. Using precise Fe line measurements, we studied the temperature structure, possible bulk motions, and iron abundance distributions in the intracluster medium (ICM). The observed spectra were well-represented by a single-temperature model, and two- or three- temperature model did not improve chi-square substantially. The temperature, derived from K-alpha line ratios of H-like and He-like Fe, agree with those derived from the single-temperature model. Because the line ratio is a steep function of temperature, the consistency supports the accuracy of temperature measurements conducted with Suzaku. Within the 34'region, the redshift derived from the central energy of the He-like Fe line is consistent with that from optical observations, within a calibration error of 18 eV or 818 km/s in the line of sight. This value is smaller than the sound velocity of ICM, which is 1500 km/s. The central energy of Fe lines at the 44'offset region around the NGC 4839 subcluster is also consistent with those within the 34'region. These results on the temperature and velocity structure suggest that the core of the cluster is in a relaxed state, and non-thermal electrons relevant to the radio halo are accelerated by intracluster turbulence rather than large-scale shocks. Fe abundance is almost constant at 0.4 solar within the 34'region, and decreases with radius. This value is slightly lower than those of other clusters, which means the gas have been mixed well during a past merger associated with the growth of the cluster.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.