Paper detail

Suzaku Observation of the High-Inclination Binary EXO 0748-676 in the Hard State

Utilizing an archived Suzaku data acquired on 2007 December 25 for 46 ks, X-ray spectroscopic properties of the dipping and eclipsing low-mass X-ray binary EXO 0748$-$676 were studied. At an assumed distance of 7.1 kpc, the data gave a persistent unabsorbed luminosity of $3.4\times10^{36}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in 0.6 $-$ 55 keV. The source was in a relatively bright low/hard state, wherein the 0.6 $-$ 55 keV spectrum can be successfully explained by a "double-seed" Comptonization model, incorporating a common corona with an electron temperature of $\sim13$ keV. The seed photons are thought to be supplied from both the neutron star surface, and a cooler truncated disk. Compared to a sample of non-dipping low-mass X-ray binaries in the low/hard state, the spectrum is subject to stronger Comptonization, with a relatively larger Comptonizing $y$-parameter of $\sim1.4$ and a larger coronal optical depth of $\sim5$. This result, when attributed to the high inclination of EXO 0748$-$676, suggests that the Comptonizing corona may elongate along the disk plane, and give a longer path for the seed photons when viewed from edge-on inclinations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.