Paper detail

Suzaku broad-band observations of the Seyfert 1 galaxies Mrk 509 and Mrk 841

We report an analysis and modelling of new Suzaku observations of the Seyfert 1 galaxies Mrk509 and Mrk841, taken between April and November 2006,for Mrk509,and between January and July 2007,for Mrk841,for a total exposure time of ~100 ks each.Data from XIS and HXD/PIN instruments,going from 0.5 to 60 keV,represent the highest spectral resolution simultaneous broad-band X-ray spectrum for these objects.We fitted the broad-band spectrum of both sources with a double Comptonisation model,adding neutral reflection from distant material and a two-phase warm absorber.We then studied the two competing models developed to explain the soft excess in terms of atomic processes:a blurred ionised disc reflection and an ionised absorption by a high velocity material.When fitting the data in the 3-10 keV range with a power law spectrum,and extrapolating this result to low energies,a soft excess is clearly observed below 2 keV:its strength is however weak compared to previous observations of both sources.A moderate hard excess is seen at energies greater than 10 keV,together with a neutral Fe K_a narrow emission line at E~6.4 keV and a broad Fe emission line.For Mrk509,the broad Fe emission line is required in all the three physical models in order to have a good fit to the data:this finding suggests that the blurred reflection model correctly describes the soft excess,but that it underestimates the broad Fe emission line.For the smeared absorption model,this suggests instead that the continuum spectrum absorbed by the outflowing gas should contain indeed a reflected component.For Mrk841,all three models that we tested provide a good fit to the data,and we cannot invalidate any of them.A broad emission line is required in the double Comptonisation and smeared absorption models,while the blurred reflection model consistently fits the broad-band spectrum,without adding any extra emission-line component.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.