Paper detail

Sustainability of large scale waste heat harvesting using thermoelectric

The amount of waste heat exergy generated globally is 69.058 EJ which can be divided into, low temperature 373 K, 30.496 EJ, medium temperature 373 K to 573 K, 14.431 EJ and high temperature 573 K, 24.131 EJ. These values of exergy have been used to determine the minimum number of pn junctions required to convert the exergy into electrical power. It is found that the number of junctions required to convert high temperature exergy increases from 8.22x10^11 to 24.66x10^11 when the aspect ratio of the legs increases from 0.5 cm^1 to 1.5 cm^1. To convert the low temperature exergy, 81.76x10^11 to 245.25x10^11 junctions will be required depending on the legs aspect ratio. The quantity of alloys containing elements such as Pb, Bi, Te, Sb, Se and Sn required to synthesize these junctions therefore is of the order of millions of tons which means the elements required is also of similar magnitude. The current world production of these elements however falls far short of this requirement, indicating significant supply chain risk. The production of these elements, even if resources are available, will emit millions of tons of CO2 showing that current alloys are non-sustainable for waste heat recovery.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.