Paper detail

Suspension flows past bluff bodies: Investigation in a microfluidic environment

This sequence of fluid dynamics videos illustrates the behavior of a suspension of noncolloidal particles flowing past various bluff body obstacles within a microfluidic device. The polystyrene particles, of 7 μm diameter and volume fraction of 8.4%, are carefully made neutrally buoyant with the suspending liquid composed of a mixture of water and a small fraction of glycerol. The channel depth is 60 μm and the typical length of the obstacles normal to the flow direction is 200 μm. The flow rate is varied to generate Reynolds numbers based on the scale of the obstacle in the approximate range 60 < Re < 500; the narrow dimension in the depth direction suppresses onset of unsteadiness and vortex shedding, so that the flows studied are found to be steady (aside from particle-scale fluctuations). Particles are observed to be depleted in the wake region of the obstacle. In certain cases, the entire wake is clear of particles; in other cases there is a portion of the wake in which particles recirculate while a portion of the wake is completely devoid of particles. Experimental observations reveal that if particles are forced into an initially particle-depleted region, they will eventually leave and will bring the wake to its original state, implying these are steady-state distributions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.