Paper detail

Survival of satellites during the migration of a Hot Jupiter

We investigate the origin and stability of extrasolar satellites orbiting close-in gas giants, focusing on whether these satellites can survive planetary migration within a protoplanetary disk. To address this question, we used Posidonius, an N-Body code with an integrated tidal model, which we expanded to account for the migration of a gas giant within a disk. Our simulations include tidal interactions between a $1M_\odot$ star and a $1M_{Jup}$ planet, as well as between the planet and its satellite, while neglecting tides raised by the star on the satellite. We adopt a standard equilibrium tide model for the satellite, planet, and star, and additionally explore the impact of dynamical tides in the convective regions of both the star and planet on satellite survival. We examine key parameters, including the initial satellite-planet distance, disk lifetime (proxy for the planet's final orbital distance), satellite mass, and satellite tidal dissipation. For simulations incorporating dynamical tides, we explore three different initial stellar rotation periods. We find that satellite survival is rare if the satellite has nonzero tidal dissipation. Survival is only possible for initial orbital distances of at least 0.6 times the Jupiter-Io separation and for planets orbiting beyond about 0.1 AU. Satellites that fail to survive are either 1) tidally disrupted, as they experience orbital decay and cross the Roche limit, or 2) dynamically disrupted, where eccentricity excitation drives their periastron within the Roche limit. Satellite survival is more likely for low tidal dissipation and higher satellite mass. Given that satellites around close-in planets appear unlikely to survive planetary migration, our findings suggest that if such satellites do exist, another process should be invoked. In that context, we also discuss the claim of the existence of a putative satellite around WASP-49 A b.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.