Paper detail

Survival distribution of the stretching and tilting of vortical structures in isotropic turbulence. Anisotropic filtering analysis

Using a Navier-Stokes isotropic turbulent field numerically simulated (Biferale et al., Phys. Fluids (2005)), we show that the probability of having a stretching-tilting larger than twice the local enstrophy is negligible. By using an anisotropic filter in the Fourier space we analyze these survival statistics when the large, the small inertial or the small inertial and dissipation scales are filtered out. The probability that the ratio (|ω \dot U|/|ω|^2) is higher than a given threshold is higher in the unfiltered isotropic field than in the fields where the large scales were filtered out and is lower than in the fields were the small inertial and dissipative scales are filtered out. This is due to the suppression of compact structures in the removed ranges. The partial removal of the background of filaments and sheets does not have a first order effect on these statistics. These results are discussed in the light of a hypothesized relation between vortical filaments, sheets and blobs. The study can be viewed as a test for this idea and tries to highlight its limits. A qualitative relation in physical space and in Fourier space can be supposed to exist for blobs only. That is for the near isotropic structures which are sufficiently described by a single spatial scale and do not suffer from the disambiguation problem as filaments and sheets do. Information is also given on the filtering effect on the angles between the strain rate tensor eigenvectors and the vorticity: eigenvector 2 reduces its alignment, while eigenvector 3 reduces its misalignment. All filters increase the gap between the most extensional eigenvalue and the intermediate one and the gap between this last and the contractile eigenvalue. When the large scales are missing, eigenvalue modulus 1 and 3 become nearly equal, similar to the modulus of the related components of the enstrophy production.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.