Paper detail

Surprising Variability of the Planetary Nebula IC 4997 = QV Sge

We present the results of a new epoch of a long-term photometric monitoring of the variable planetary nebula IC~4997. The integral $UBV$ light curves display a continuing brightening of 0.$^{m}15$ in $V$, a slight rise (<0.$^{m}1$) in $B$, and constancy in $U$. The $B-V$ color has got redder from 0.$^{m}4$ in 2000 to 0.$^{m}7$ in 2019, whereas the $U-B$ color has not changed significantly. New $JHKL$ photometry was obtained in 2019. We found the source to be fainter by 0.$^{m}4$ in $L$ and bluer by 0.$^{m}2$ in the $K-L$ color if compared to the data of 1999-2006. The long-term brightness variations are due mostly to the changing input of emission lines to the integral light. Low-dispersion spectroscopic observations carried out in 2010-2019 revealed a continuing decrease in the $\lambda4363/\lambda4340$ ratio: it decreased by a factor of $\sim3$ in 30 years and reached the level of 1960-1970. The absolute intensities of [OIII] nebualr lines increased by a factor of $>2$ from 1990 to 2019, whereas the [OIII] $λ$4363 line had weakened by a factor of 2 comparing to the maximum value observed in 2000. The variation of H$β$ absolute intensity in 1960-2019 was shown to be similar to that of [OIII] nebular lines, but of smaller amplitude. The electron density in the outer part of the nebula was estimated from the [SII] and [ClIII] lines. Basing on the data on absolute intensities we propose a possible scenario describing the change of $N_e,T_e$ in 1970-2019. The spectral variability of IC~4997 could be explained by a variation of electron temperature in the nebula caused by not so much the change in ionizing flux from the central star as the variable stellar wind and related processes. The photometric and spectral changes observed for IC~4997 in 1960-2019 may be interpreted as an observable consequence of a single episode of enhanced mass loss from the variable central star.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.