Paper detail

Surface quality improvement of porous thin films suitable for nanoindentation

The reliability of perovskite material LSCF to be used as cathode parts in solid oxide fuel cells also relies on its mechanical properties. Adequate surface conditions are desired when the as-sintered porous thin films are subjected to nanoindentation for mechanical property determination. In this study, extensive cracks and considerable surface roughness were found in the LSCF films after sintering at high temperatures. This would significantly scatter the nanoindentation data and result in unreliable measurements. Various attempts including the comparison of film deposition methods, drying and sintering processes, and reformulating the ink were made to improve the surface quality. Results revealed little dependence of cracking and surface roughness on deposition methods, drying or sintering processes. It was found that the critical factor for obtaining crack-free and smooth LSCF films was the ability of the ink to be self-levelling in the earlier wet state. Reproducible nanoindentation measurements were obtained for the films with improved surface quality.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.